More than satisfying
Q1 GDP GROWTH
FINAL PROJECTION OF AROUND 6.5% FOR THE YEAR WILL CUSHION ANY DOWNSIDE IN THE COMING QUARTERS
More than satisfying
HE GDP GROWTH figure
for Q1 was eagerly
awaited for several rea-
sons. First, in light of the
tariff trauma inflicted by
the US on India, this number was going
to be important even though the deci-
sion has been implemented only in late
August. Second, it will be a major lever
for the Reserve Bank of India (RBI)
when it takes a decision on the repo
rate. The direction of policy has
changed from inflation to growth in
the past few policies and the 7.8%
number definitely does not indicate
any weakness. Third, given the final
growth projection of around 6.5% for
the year, it will provide a cushion to any
downside in the coming quarters.
The performance has been more
than satisfying as growth is broad-
based in all the services segments, and
two in the secondary sector grew at
impressive rates. Agriculture has pro-
vided the expected support while min-
ing and electricity have been the low
performers, which was expected as the
growth numbers mirror what was
already known in the index of indus-
trial production (IIP) numbers for this
quarter. Hopes are high of a recovery in
urban demand this festival season
with the government also likely to take
some affirmative steps.
One of the major contributors to
manufacturing growth has been a
steady increase in profits, notwith-
standing a lower IIP growth. In fact, the
highlight of corporate performance
was lower growth in turnover mainly
due to the urban consumption chal-
lenge, but smart rise in profits which is
a major part of the concept of value
added. If one were to look ahead, the
scenario is one which can be "stable to
better". The reason is that the element
that can drive manufacturing is
expected to be consumption, where
MADAN SABNAVIS
Chief economist, Bank of Baroda
the government has already given a
boost through income tax relief. The
goods and services tax (GST) cuts
should come into effect next month,
which will also help boost consump-
tion. Nominal consumption grew by
9.1% this quarter, and it should get
better to support growth at a time
when inflation is rather low. The mon-
soon has been good and augurs well for
rural consumption too. The invest-
ment rate has also been
stable this quarter at
30.4%, which can
improve gradually as con-
sumption picks up.
Construction has been
another star performer
with a growth of 7.6%.
The contribution has
come from both the gov-
ernment focus on infra-
structure as well as the
housing sector. The latter
has witnessed signs of
revival, which can be
expected to sustain, if it is
not bettered, during the festival season
when individuals normally buy homes.
The services sector has once again
been the engine for growth. Given that
ours' is a services-driven economy, a
lot of support comes from this seg-
ment. In fact, it has to counter the
repercussions of tariffs, which is likely
on manufacturing. Trade, transport,
etc. clocked growth of 8.6% as con-
sumer spending continued to be brisk
with "experience" still being a driving
factor. The boom in e-commerce and
retailing has also contributed to the
growth. And a greater use of phones
and internet has increased output
from the communications segment.
The financial sector continued to
register swift growth of 9.5% in line
with that in deposits and credit. This
may remain stable for the next couple
of quarters as growth in credit is
expected to pick up in the
busy season. Similarly for
public administration
and defence services,
9.8% growth over 9%
last year is impressive as
the government has been
on target with spending
both at the central and
state levels.
Given that inflation
is expected to be
benign and low for
at least Q2 and Q3,
there would be a
tendency for an
upward bias in the
real GDP growth
numbers
A point of curiosity
that will be nagging the
reader is that while the
direction all these seg-
ments took was on
expected lines, the num-
bers have been high. This can be
explained by the way in which GDP
numbers are reckoned. All numbers are
generally calculated in current prices
that are available. These numbers are
then scaled down based on price defla-
tors. These deflators tend to be the
wholesale price index (WPI) in most
cases. This has to be done to convert
nominal numbers to real. This year, the
WPI has tended to be either very low or
negative. This comes out from the
growth in nominal GDP which was
8.8% this quarter-just 1% higher
than the real GDP growth. Normally
these two numbers have a difference
of 3-4%. Given that inflation is
expected to be benign and low for at
least Q2 and Q3, there would be a ten-
dency for an upward bias in the real
GDP growth numbers.
All this also means that achieving
the 6.5% growth number, which the
RBI has projected for the year (at the
time of forecast it did not take into
account the additional 25% tariff
imposed by the US), is possible. Tax
benefits have been granted to individ-
uals on income and a similar benefit is
expected from GST. Both will aid
domestic demand, which is now cru-
cial for steadying the boat assuming
that exports to the US will take a hit
due to the tariffs (likely to materialise
after three-four months). With expec-
tations of a normal monsoon, kharif
production-which is a good proxy
for potential rural spending-seems
to be on course. Therefore, this is a
good augury.
The next question is, how will the
Monetary Policy Committee look at
this number? If there will be an upward
bias due to the deflators in the coming
quarters too, then the overall GDP
growth will definitely be one which
may not cause concern. Besides, the
transmission of past actions is still on
with the cash reserve ratio cut to be
invoked from September onwards. It
may be tricky to support a rate cut at
this time based on growth numbers-
either of Q1 or the full year. Yet the tar-
iff impact on the micro, small, and
medium enterprise sector in particu-
lar will always be on the radar. It would
be an interesting call nonetheless.
Views are personal